Missouri Case Party

Six Flags St. Louis, LLC d/b/a Six Flags St. Louis and John/Jane Doe Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID: six-flags-st-louis-llc-d/b/a-six-flags-st-louis-and-john/jane-doe
Cases Shown: 1
Top Practice Route: Personal Injury

Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Personal Injury Civil Litigation Slip and Fall

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Consultation Call Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving Six Flags St. Louis, LLC d/b/a Six Flags St. Louis and John/Jane Doe

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Jun 20, 2023

Carly Munoz, Appellant, vs. Six Flags St. Louis, LLC d/b/a Six Flags St. Louis and John/Jane Doe, Respondents.

Respondent

Carly Munoz appealed the grant of summary judgment in favor of Six Flags St. Louis on her negligence claim. Munoz was injured after being scared by a clown actor at the park's Fright Fest, causing her to run and trip. The trial court granted summary judgment based on the doctrine of implied primary assumption of the risk, finding Munoz's injury arose from risks inherent to the event. The appellate court affirmed, concluding that Munoz knew, appreciated, and voluntarily accepted the inherent risks of Fright Fest, including the potential for fright leading to running and falling.

Personal Injury Civil Litigation Slip and Fall