Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

SOUTHEAST MISSOURI RESIDENTIAL SERVICES, SOUTHEAST MISSOURI HOSPITAL, AND TREASURER OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI AS CUSTODIAN OF THE 2nd INJURY FUND Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
southeast-missouri-residential-services-southeast-missouri-hospital-and-treasurer-of-the-state-of-missouri-as-custodian-of-the-2nd-injury-fund
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving SOUTHEAST MISSOURI RESIDENTIAL SERVICES, SOUTHEAST MISSOURI HOSPITAL, AND TREASURER OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI AS CUSTODIAN OF THE 2nd INJURY FUND

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Cindy A. Rowe filed a worker's compensation claim against her employer and the Second Injury Fund, which was denied by an Administrative Law Judge and affirmed by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. Rowe appealed, arguing the Commission failed to rule on her fourth motion to submit additional evidence and did not provide a complete record for review. The appellate court reversed the Commission's award and remanded the case, holding that the Commission erred by not considering and ruling upon Rowe's motion as required by administrative rule and by failing to fulfill its statutory and rule-based duty to certify a complete record on appeal.