Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Sprint Lumber, Inc., Scott Laderoute, Jerry Downey, Sheila Higdon, Jess Reynolds, and Ray Meng Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
sprint-lumber-inc-scott-laderoute-jerry-downey-sheila-higdon-jess-reynolds-and-ray-meng
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Sprint Lumber, Inc., Scott Laderoute, Jerry Downey, Sheila Higdon, Jess Reynolds, and Ray Meng

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Sprint Lumber, Inc., and its employees (Sprint Lumber Parties) sued Union Insurance Company (Union) for declaratory judgment, breach of contract, and breach of fiduciary duty after Union denied coverage and a defense in a federal lawsuit brought by a competitor. The trial court found Union had a duty to defend and indemnify, but granted summary judgment to Union on the breach of fiduciary duty claim and limited the calculation of statutory penalties and attorney fees. The appellate court affirmed Union's duty to defend and indemnify, reversed the summary judgment on the breach of fiduciary duty claim, and reversed the calculation of attorney fees for breach of the duty to defend, remanding for further proceedings and recalculation.