Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

St. Louis Center for Aesthetic and Restorative Dentistry, et al. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
st-louis-center-for-aesthetic-and-restorative-dentistry-et-al
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Personal Injury
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving St. Louis Center for Aesthetic and Restorative Dentistry, et al.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Dr. Guilan Norouzi, through her bankruptcy trustee, appealed the circuit court's grant of summary judgment in favor of her former attorney, A. Thomas DeWoskin, and his law firm, in a legal malpractice action. Norouzi alleged DeWoskin was negligent in failing to appear and defend her at a damages hearing in an underlying lawsuit, resulting in a substantial judgment against her. The Eastern District reversed the summary judgment, holding that the circuit court's post-judgment ruling was not an intervening cause of Norouzi's damages and that her expert witness sufficiently identified her damages.