Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

St. Louis City Circuit Court, et al. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
st-louis-city-circuit-court-et-al
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving St. Louis City Circuit Court, et al.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Appellant

M.T.M. and P.M. petitioned the circuit court to expunge their misdemeanor convictions for assault and harassment under § 610.140, RSMo. The St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department opposed, arguing the expungement was inconsistent with public welfare and that the petitioners posed a threat to public safety. The circuit court granted the expungement, and the Department appealed. The appellate court affirmed, holding that the Department failed to rebut the statutory presumption for expungement and that the circuit court did not err in its handling of the Department's offer of proof regarding victim testimony.