St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Stacey Moore Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
stacey-moore
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Personal Injury
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Personal InjuryCivil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free ConsultationCall Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving Stacey Moore

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Sep 3, 2024

Stacey Moore, Appellant, v. Monsanto Company, Respondent.

Appellant

Stacey Moore sued Monsanto Company, alleging that his exposure to Roundup caused non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. After a jury returned a verdict for Monsanto, Moore appealed, asserting the circuit court erred by excluding his expert witness, overruling his motion for a new trial based on Monsanto's opening statement, and failing to strike a venireperson for cause. The Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, affirmed the circuit court's judgment, finding no abuse of discretion in any of the challenged rulings.

Personal InjuryCivil Litigation