Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

State ex rel. Clinton No. 1, Inc., Relator Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
state-ex-rel-clinton-no-1-inc-relator
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Wrongful Death
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving State ex rel. Clinton No. 1, Inc., Relator

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Donna Yarnell filed a wrongful death action against Clinton No. 1, Inc., a healthcare center, alleging negligence after her mother contracted COVID-19. Clinton sought a writ of mandamus to compel the circuit court to dismiss the action, claiming immunity under the federal PREP Act and two Missouri statutes. The Missouri Supreme Court quashed its preliminary writ of mandamus, holding that Yarnell's petition did not implicate a "covered countermeasure" under the PREP Act, Clinton failed to demonstrate deployment under one state immunity statute, and Yarnell adequately alleged recklessness to overcome the other state immunity statutes.