Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

State ex rel. Jean Peters-Baker, Relator Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
state-ex-rel-jean-petersbaker-relator
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving State ex rel. Jean Peters-Baker, Relator

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Relator, Jackson County Prosecuting Attorney Jean Peters-Baker, sought a writ of prohibition to bar Judge Bryan E. Round from enforcing an order disqualifying her entire office in a post-conviction case. The disqualification stemmed from an attorney, Jeanette Wolpink, joining the PAO after representing the movant, Tyrone Skinner, in his direct appeal. The Missouri Supreme Court made its preliminary writ of prohibition permanent, holding that the trial court's order failed to comply with the framework established in State v. Lemasters for imputing conflicts of interest and caused irreparable harm. The Court found the PAO's screening process was effective and no appearance of impropriety existed, and also determined the case was not moot despite Wolpink's departure from the PAO.