Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Sheryl Craig Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-company-and-sheryl-craig
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Personal Injury
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Sheryl Craig

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Jan 17, 2023

Michael Walsh vs. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Sheryl Craig

Respondent

Michael Walsh and Sheryl Craig appealed the trial court's summary judgment in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company in an equitable garnishment proceeding. Walsh had obtained a large judgment against Craig following a motor vehicle accident, and State Farm, Craig's insurer, paid its policy limit. Walsh and Craig sought additional post-judgment interest, arguing the policy required State Farm to pay interest on the full underlying judgment until satisfied. The appellate court affirmed, holding that State Farm's obligation to pay post-judgment interest terminated when it paid its liability coverage limit, and the policy language was unambiguous.