Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

State of Missouri, ex tel. Lavender Farms, LLC and Paul Benton Weeks III Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
state-of-missouri-ex-tel-lavender-farms-llc-and-paul-benton-weeks-iii
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving State of Missouri, ex tel. Lavender Farms, LLC and Paul Benton Weeks III

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Lavender Farms, LLC and Paul Benton Weeks III appealed the circuit court's judgment quashing a preliminary writ that had stayed an administrative enforcement action by the Missouri Secretary of State, Securities Division. Lavender Farms argued that the administrative action was barred by a statute of repose in the Missouri Securities Act. The appellate court affirmed, holding that the statute of repose in question applies only to civil actions brought by purchasers of securities, not to administrative enforcement actions by the Securities Division.