Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

State of Miswsouri Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
state-of-miswsouri
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving State of Miswsouri

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / May 29, 2018

State of Miswsouri vs. William (Billy) Carter

Appellant

William Carter, committed to the Department of Mental Health after pleading not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect (NGRI) and also as a sexually violent predator (SVP), appealed the trial court's denial of his application for conditional release under section 552.040.10 as moot. The trial court reasoned that any relief granted would be ineffectual due to his concurrent SVP commitment. The appellate court reversed and remanded, holding that an application for conditional release from an NGRI commitment is not moot simply because of a concurrent SVP commitment, as removing one basis for confinement provides effectual relief.