Skip to content
St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Stephen C. Wynn, et al Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
stephen-c-wynn-et-al
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Personal Injury
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Personal InjuryCivil LitigationEmployment Law

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Personal Injury ConsultationCall About A Personal Injury Claim

Cases Involving Stephen C. Wynn, et al

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Nov 26, 2019

Stephen C. Wynn, et al vs. BNSF Railway Company

Appellant

Stephen C. Wynn, a BNSF Railway Company conductor, sued BNSF under FELA after being injured in a train collision with an unoccupied car on the tracks. A jury found in Wynn's favor, awarding $3,500,000 in damages. BNSF appealed, alleging error in the submission and refusal of various jury instructions. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding no reversible error in the submitted instructions and upholding the refusal of BNSF's proposed mitigation of damages instruction.

Personal InjuryEmployment LawCivil Litigation