Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

STEVEN EUGENE HARDCASTLE Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
steven-eugene-hardcastle
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving STEVEN EUGENE HARDCASTLE

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Apr 22, 2024

STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent vs. STEVEN EUGENE HARDCASTLE, Appellant

Appellant

Steven Hardcastle was found guilty of statutory sodomy and two counts of sexual abuse in the first degree. He appealed his sexual abuse convictions, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to prove forcible compulsion. The appellate court affirmed the judgment, finding that the victim's testimony, coupled with the age disparity, location, and Hardcastle's position of authority, provided sufficient evidence for a reasonable juror to conclude that forcible compulsion was used.