Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Steven Freedman Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
steven-freedman
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Personal Injury
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Steven Freedman

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / May 19, 2020

Tonda Hill vs. Steven Freedman

Respondent

Tonda Hill sued her former supervisor, Steven Freedman, for negligence after a car accident in Missouri. The trial court dismissed Hill's negligence claim with prejudice, finding that Kansas law applied because Hill had received workers' compensation benefits under Kansas law, and under Kansas law, her claim was barred by the Kansas Workers Compensation Act and the Kansas Tort Claims Act. The appellate court affirmed the dismissal, agreeing that Kansas law governed the claim and precluded Hill from suing Freedman for negligence.