Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Superior Detail, Lonnie Vaught and Julie Vaught Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
superior-detail-lonnie-vaught-and-julie-vaught
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Corporate Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Superior Detail, Lonnie Vaught and Julie Vaught

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Dec 10, 2019

TCN Investments, LLC vs. Superior Detail, Lonnie Vaught and Julie Vaught

Respondent

TCN Investments, LLC, sued Superior Detail, LLC, and its guarantors, Lonnie and Julie Vaught, for breach of a commercial lease agreement. The trial court found in favor of TCN, awarding damages for unpaid rent, reletting costs, and restoration expenses, along with attorney's fees. On appeal, Superior challenged the trial court's interpretation of the lease regarding damage offsets, the inclusion of alteration costs as reletting expenses, and the award for landscaping restoration. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment on all substantive issues but remanded the case for the sole purpose of determining the amount of reasonable attorney's fees TCN incurred on appeal.