Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Susan Carlyle Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
susan-carlyle
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Personal Injury
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Susan Carlyle

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Jun 25, 2019

Cindy Lockhart, et al vs. Susan Carlyle

Respondent

Cindy and Dennis Lockhart sued Susan Carlyle for the wrongful death of their son, Tyler Lockhart, alleging negligent entrustment of a vehicle to Carlyle's adult son, Richard Gallagher. The trial court granted summary judgment for Carlyle, finding she did not entrust the vehicle. The appellate court affirmed, holding that merely providing financial assistance for a vehicle's purchase, without ownership or control, does not constitute entrustment. The court also rejected a general negligence claim, stating that a parent-adult child relationship alone does not create a duty to protect third parties.