Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Susan Joseph, f/k/a Susan Schrauth Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
susan-joseph-f/k/a-susan-schrauth
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Susan Joseph, f/k/a Susan Schrauth

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Mar 15, 2022

Susan Joseph, f/k/a Susan Schrauth, Respondent, vs. Eric Schrauth, Appellant.

Respondent

Eric Schrauth appealed the circuit court's dismissal of his motion to modify his spousal maintenance obligation to Susan Joseph, his former spouse. Eric argued that his current $1,000 monthly maintenance was modifiable because the divorce decree was ambiguous or silent on that specific amount, and the separation agreement was also silent. The appellate court affirmed the dismissal, holding that the dissolution judgment's non-modifiability provision unambiguously applied to both the initial $800 and the subsequent $1,000 monthly maintenance obligations, thus rendering the maintenance non-modifiable.