Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Suzanne Steinbach Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
suzanne-steinbach
Cases Shown
2
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Suzanne Steinbach

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Nov 2, 2021

Suzanne Steinbach vs. Maxion Wheels Sedalia LLC

Appellant

Suzanne Steinbach appealed the trial court's summary judgment in favor of Maxion Wheels Sedalia LLC on her employment discrimination and retaliation claims. The trial court granted summary judgment based on claim splitting and denied Steinbach's motion for leave to file a reply out of time to assert an affirmative avoidance of acquiescence. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's finding that Steinbach improperly split her claims but reversed the denial of her motion to file a reply, finding the trial court abused its discretion by concluding no excusable neglect was shown. The case was remanded for reconsideration of summary judgment in light of the potential acquiescence defense.