Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Date unavailable
Missouri Case Party
S.W. Missouri Cases
This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.
- Party ID
- sw
- Cases Shown
- 2
- Top Practice Route
- Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Related Practice Pages
Practical guidance connected to this party profile
These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.
Legal Help From The Archive
Need help turning court research into a case plan?
If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.
Cases Involving S.W.
Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.
Respondent
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Date unavailable
M.S.C., Respondent, v. S.W., Appellant.
MSC filed a petition for a full order of protection against her neighbor, SW, alleging repeated threats and harassment constituting stalking under the Adult Abuse Act. The trial court granted the order, finding SW's conduct, directed at MSC and her family, met the statutory definition of stalking. On appeal, SW challenged the sufficiency of the evidence and the application of the clean hands doctrine. The appellate court affirmed, holding that the evidence was sufficient to prove stalking and that the clean hands doctrine does not apply to statutory remedies under the Act.