Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Tammy Walsh Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
tammy-walsh
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Tammy Walsh

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / May 28, 2024

Tammy Walsh vs. Missouri State Board of Nursing

Appellant

Tammy Walsh, a licensed nurse, appealed an order from the Missouri State Board of Nursing that extended her probation for four years due to multiple violations of her initial disciplinary order, which stemmed from diverting and using medication. Walsh argued the additional discipline was arbitrary, capricious, and unsupported by evidence of chemical dependency. The appellate court affirmed the Board's decision, concluding that the Board's action was supported by substantial evidence of probation violations and was within its statutory authority and discretion.