Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Technical Education Services, Inc. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
technical-education-services-inc
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Technical Education Services, Inc.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Nov 24, 2020

Steven Pinkerton vs. Technical Education Services, Inc.

Respondent

Steven Pinkerton sued Technical Education Services, Inc. (AIM) for fraud and misrepresentation. AIM moved to compel arbitration, which was initially granted by the trial court and affirmed by the Missouri Supreme Court, delegating arbitrability issues to an arbitrator. The arbitrator subsequently found the arbitration agreement unconscionable and unenforceable, dismissing the arbitration. Pinkerton then voluntarily dismissed his lawsuit without prejudice and refiled it. AIM again moved to compel arbitration, but the trial court denied the motion, finding AIM collaterally estopped by the arbitrator's decision. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's order, holding that the trial court properly determined the collateral estoppel effect of the arbitrator's decision, which constituted a judgment on the merits, and that Pinkerton's voluntary dismissal did not vacate it.