Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Teresa Henry Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
teresa-henry
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Teresa Henry

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Nov 12, 2019

Paula Wyrick vs. Teresa Henry

Respondent

Paula Wyrick sought records from Teresa Henry, the City Clerk for Raytown, Missouri, under the Sunshine Law after Wyrick's mother died in a car accident. Henry denied the requests, asserting a litigation exception. The trial court found Henry knowingly and purposefully violated the Sunshine Law, ordered disclosure, imposed a civil penalty, and awarded attorney's fees. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, holding that the litigation exception does not apply based on the requestor's identity or the records' potential relevance to litigation, and that Henry's violations were knowing and purposeful. The case was remanded for consideration of appellate attorney's fees.