Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

The Doe Run Resources Corporation Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
the-doe-run-resources-corporation
Cases Shown
2
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving The Doe Run Resources Corporation

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Rick Parker, Assessor for Reynolds County, appealed the circuit court's judgment affirming the State Tax Commission's (STC) decision regarding the property tax assessment of The Doe Run Resources Corporation's leasehold interest in federal land. The Assessor contended the STC misapplied Frontier Airlines, Inc. v. State Tax Comm'n by using the "bonus value" method instead of the Assessor's "income-based royalty approach." The appellate court affirmed, holding that Frontier Airlines controls, requiring the "bonus value" method for leasehold interests in tax-exempt property, and the Assessor's proposed method improperly valued the tax-exempt real estate itself.