Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

The Honorable Brenda Stacey Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
the-honorable-brenda-stacey
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving The Honorable Brenda Stacey

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Jefferson County 9-1-1 Dispatch filed a declaratory judgment action against the Director of the Missouri Department of Revenue in Jefferson County. The Director moved to change venue to Cole County, which the circuit court denied. The Director sought a writ of prohibition from the Missouri Supreme Court. The Supreme Court made its preliminary writ of prohibition permanent, holding that venue was proper in Cole County under the general venue statute, section 508.010.2, because the specific venue statute for declaratory judgments regarding administrative rules, section 536.050.1, did not apply as no promulgated administrative rule was challenged.