Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

The Honorable M. Brandon Baker Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
the-honorable-m-brandon-baker
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Personal Injury
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving The Honorable M. Brandon Baker

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Darin Lutman sought a writ of prohibition to prevent the release of his medical records from two health networks, arguing they were protected by physician-patient privilege. The circuit court had ordered the disclosure of these records in a wrongful death and personal injury suit filed against Lutman after a fatal auto accident. The Missouri Supreme Court made its preliminary writ of prohibition permanent, holding that Lutman's statements to police and in an apology letter did not constitute an implied waiver of the privilege, as they did not show a clear, unequivocal purpose to divulge confidential medical information. The Court also clarified that a writ of prohibition remains appropriate even if records have been disclosed, as a partial remedy can be ordered.