St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

The Honorable R. Brent Elliott Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
the-honorable-r-brent-elliott
Cases Shown
2
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Criminal LawCivil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free ConsultationCall Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving The Honorable R. Brent Elliott

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Dec 18, 2018

State ex rel. John Jason Young vs. The Honorable R. Brent Elliott

Respondent

Relator John Jason Young was convicted of felony DWI and ordered to a 120-day institutional treatment program pursuant to § 559.115.3. Despite the Department of Corrections reporting Young's successful completion and recommending release on probation, the circuit court denied probation without holding a hearing within the statutory 120-day timeframe. The appellate court issued a permanent writ of mandamus, directing the circuit court to rescind its order and release Young on probation, holding that the court lacked authority to deny probation without the required hearing.

Criminal LawCivil Litigation