Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

The Honorable Wendy Wexler-Horn, Judge of the Circuit Court of the County of St. Francois, 24th Judicial Circuit Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
the-honorable-wendy-wexlerhorn-judge-of-the-circuit-court-of-the-county-of-st-francois-24th-judicial-circuit
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Cases Involving The Honorable Wendy Wexler-Horn, Judge of the Circuit Court of the County of St. Francois, 24th Judicial Circuit

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Anthony Caruthers, facing murder and other charges, sought a writ of prohibition to prevent the circuit court from ordering a mental evaluation under Chapter 552. Caruthers intended to present a diminished capacity defense, not a not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect (NGRI) defense. The Missouri Supreme Court made the preliminary writ of prohibition permanent, holding that Chapter 552 does not authorize a mental evaluation for a diminished capacity defense, nor does it allow the court to order an opinion on whether the defendant lacked a state of mind that is an element of the charged offense.