Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

The Wrecking Crew, Inc. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
the-wrecking-crew-inc
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving The Wrecking Crew, Inc.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Dec 24, 2024

The Wrecking Crew, Inc., Appellant, v. OHM Hotel Group, LLC, et al., Respondents.

Appellant

The Wrecking Crew, Inc. appealed the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of OHM Hotel Group, LLC, et al., concerning a dispute over payment for demolition work. The central issue revolved around the authenticity of a waiver and release document, which The Wrecking Crew's president initially admitted signing but later, supported by a handwriting expert's affidavit, claimed was forged. The appellate court reversed the summary judgment, concluding that the contradictory evidence created a genuine dispute of material fact regarding the waiver's legitimacy, which could not be resolved at the summary judgment stage. The case was remanded for further proceedings.