Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Theaun Romaine Hardridge Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
theaun-romaine-hardridge
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Theaun Romaine Hardridge

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Jul 6, 2021

State of Missouri vs. Theaun Romaine Hardridge

Respondent

Theaun Hardridge appealed his convictions for assault, unlawful use of a weapon, armed criminal action, and resisting a lawful stop. Hardridge argued that the statute for unlawful use of a weapon was ambiguous, requiring the State to charge him under a subsection with a lesser penalty, and that the trial court plainly erred by admitting evidence of his bad conduct in jail during the sentencing hearing. The Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District, affirmed the judgment, finding the statute unambiguous and that the admission of sentencing evidence was not plain error.