Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Timothy Gallagher Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
timothy-gallagher
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Timothy Gallagher

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Jul 21, 2020

Timothy Gallagher, Appellant, vs. Missouri Department of Revenue, Respondent.

Appellant

Timothy Gallagher appealed the trial court's judgment upholding the Director of Revenue's revocation of his driving privileges for refusing a breath test. Gallagher argued there was insufficient evidence to support a finding of probable cause that he drove while intoxicated, specifically regarding his condition while driving and the time of the accident. The appellate court affirmed, finding that the Director presented ample evidence, including circumstantial evidence and indicia of intoxication, to establish probable cause.