Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Tracy Sykora, Ashley Sykora and Matthew Sykora Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
tracy-sykora-ashley-sykora-and-matthew-sykora
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Tracy Sykora, Ashley Sykora and Matthew Sykora

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Sep 17, 2024

Tracy Sykora, Ashley Sykora and Matthew Sykora vs. Farmers Insurance Company, INC.

Appellant

Farmers Insurance Company appealed the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the Sykoras on their equitable garnishment claim, which the trial court certified as final for appeal under Rule 74.01(b). This was Farmers' second attempt to appeal the judgment. The appellate court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, holding that the trial court's Rule 74.01(b) certification was ineffective because the judgment did not dispose of a distinct "judicial unit," as the Sykoras' bad faith failure to settle claim against Farmers remained pending and arose from the same facts and transactions.