Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Twentieth Judical Circuit of the State of Missouri, by the Honorable Isidore I. Lamke, Presiding Judge, Relator Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
twentieth-judical-circuit-of-the-state-of-missouri-by-the-honorable-isidore-i-lamke-presiding-judge-relator
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Twentieth Judical Circuit of the State of Missouri, by the Honorable Isidore I. Lamke, Presiding Judge, Relator

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

The Twentieth Judicial Circuit of Missouri filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus to compel the Franklin County Board of Commissioners and Interim Auditor to appropriate and disburse its full Fiscal Year 2020 Court Budget Estimate, including funds for Juvenile Court operations, salaries, and benefits. The County Commission had adopted a significantly reduced budget, particularly for the Juvenile Court, and terminated two Juvenile Court employees. The appellate court issued a permanent writ of mandamus, holding that the County Commission failed to comply with Section 50.640, RSMo, by unilaterally changing the budget without the Circuit Court's consent or seeking review from the Judicial Finance Commission.