Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Weatherby Lake Improvement Company, INC Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
weatherby-lake-improvement-company-inc
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Insurance Bad Faith
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Weatherby Lake Improvement Company, INC

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Date unavailable

Weatherby Lake Improvement Company, INC vs. City of Weatherby Lake Board of Zoning Adjustment

Appellant

Weatherby Lake Improvement Company (WLIC) appealed the denial of its non-use variance application by the City of Weatherby Lake Board of Zoning Adjustment (BZA), which had been affirmed by the circuit court. WLIC sought a variance from a fifty-foot setback to six feet for a property near a dam, citing concerns about disturbing an impervious core. The appellate court reversed the BZA's decision and the circuit court's judgment, holding that the BZA's decision lacked competent and substantial evidence because the applicable municipal ordinances were not introduced into evidence at the administrative hearing. The reversal was without prejudice to WLIC's right to file a new application.