Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Weston T. Loveland III Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
weston-t-loveland-iii
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Insurance Bad Faith
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Weston T. Loveland III

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Weston Loveland sued Gabriel Austin for personal injuries. Austin's insurer, Shelter Mutual Insurance Company, denied coverage and defense. Loveland and Austin then entered into a Section 537.065 agreement and submitted the claim to arbitration, resulting in an award for Loveland. Shelter sought to intervene in the subsequent confirmation proceeding and challenged the award, arguing it had a right to intervene and that the confirmation was barred by collateral estoppel or an invalid arbitration agreement. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, holding that Shelter did not have a right to intervene and that its other arguments lacked merit.