Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Xinsheng Gan Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
xinsheng-gan
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Xinsheng Gan

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Jan 25, 2022

Xinsheng Gan vs. Penny Schrock

Appellant

Xinsheng Gan appealed the circuit court's affirmation of an Administrative Hearing Commission (AHC) decision regarding the amount of back pay and other relief owed to him after his improper dismissal and subsequent reinstatement from state employment. Gan challenged the AHC's limitations on his back-pay award, denial of interest, refusal to compensate for adverse tax consequences, and its finding that he was reinstated rather than rehired. The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's judgment, concluding the AHC did not err in its determinations.