Skip to content
St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Yuzi Mussa Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
yuzi-mussa
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Employment LawCivil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Employment ConsultationCall About A Employment Claim

Cases Involving Yuzi Mussa

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Jul 19, 2022

Yuzi Mussa vs. Division of Employment Security

Appellant

Yuzi Mussa appealed the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's decision, which found she was overpaid unemployment compensation benefits due to a period of disqualification. The Division of Employment Security moved to dismiss Mussa's appellate brief for failure to comply with Rule 84.04. The appellate court denied the motion to dismiss, exercising its discretion to review the appeal on the merits, and reversed the Commission's decision, finding it was not supported by substantial evidence.

Employment LawCivil Litigation