St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Case Authority

sharp v all n one plumbing 612 sw3d 240

This authority appears in 17 citation records in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive.

Canonical ID
case:sharp-v-all-n-one-plumbing-612-sw3d-240
Citation Sample
Sharp v. All-N-One Plumbing, 612 S.W.3d 240
Cases Shown
17
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to cases citing this authority

These links route legal-research traffic from this authority profile into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the authority itself or the cited cases map to a practical client issue.

Civil LitigationEmployment LawFamily LawReal EstateEstate PlanningCriminal Law

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help with an issue tied to sharp v all n one plumbing 612 sw3d 240?

This authority profile is public case-law research. If the authority connects to your claim or dispute, Ott Law Firm can help evaluate evidence, deadlines, and next steps.

Free ConsultationCall Ott Law Firm

Citation Treatment

cited

15

followed

2

Cases Citing sharp v all n one plumbing 612 sw3d 240

Showing up to 50 opinion records linked to this authority.

cited

Citation: Sharp v. All-N-One Plumbing, 612 S.W.3d 240

The court affirmed the circuit court's judgment in favor of the Rosenbohms on their adverse possession and trespass claims against Stiens regarding disputed tracts of property in Nodaway County. The court rejected Stiens's arguments regarding excluded evidence, cross-examination, jury instructions on permissive use defense, and remanded the case for the court to amend the judgment with precise legal descriptions of the disputed property.

Real EstateCivil LitigationEstate Planning