St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Case Authority

state v bateman 318 sw3d 681

This authority appears in 90 citation records in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive.

Canonical ID
case:state-v-bateman-318-sw3d-681
Citation Sample
State v. Bateman, 318 S.W.3d 681
Cases Shown
50
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to cases citing this authority

These links route legal-research traffic from this authority profile into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the authority itself or the cited cases map to a practical client issue.

Criminal LawCivil LitigationFamily LawPersonal Injury

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help with an issue tied to state v bateman 318 sw3d 681?

This authority profile is public case-law research. If the authority connects to your claim or dispute, Ott Law Firm can help evaluate evidence, deadlines, and next steps.

Free ConsultationCall Ott Law Firm

Citation Treatment

cited

89

followed

1

Cases Citing state v bateman 318 sw3d 681

Showing up to 50 opinion records linked to this authority.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Feb 17, 2026

State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. Gerald R. Nytes, Appellant.

cited

Citation: State v. Bateman, 318 S.W.3d 681

Gerald Nytes appealed his conviction for violating a full order of protection, arguing the State failed to prove he had notice of the order as required by statute. The court affirmed, finding sufficient evidence of notice based on Nytes's presence at the contested order of protection hearing and his subsequent violation through phone calls made from jail to the protected party.

Criminal LawFamily LawCivil Litigation