OTT LAW

Anthony D. Booker, Sr., et al., Respondents, v. City of Velda City, Missouri, et al., Appellants.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Anthony D. Booker, Sr., et al., Respondents, v. City of Velda City, Missouri, et al., Appellants. Case Number: 71146 Handdown Date: 11/11/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Michael Godfrey Counsel for Appellant: Rodolfo Rivera Counsel for Respondent: Ryan S. Shaughnessy Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Simon and Hoff, JJ., concur. Opinion: ORDER The city of Velda City, Missouri (Velda City), and defendants, Robert Flenoy, James Buchanan and Robert Hensley, Aldermen of Velda City, appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County in favor of plaintiffs, Anthony D. Booker, Sr. and Cleo Watts, taxpayers and registered voters of Velda City, on their petition for assesment of a civil fine against defendants for violations of the Missouri Sunshine Law, Section 610.010, et seq. RSMo 1996, for injunctive relief to prevent Velda City and defendants from acting on a Bill of Impeachment passed by defendants at a special meeting of the Board of Aldermen, and for a declaratory judgment that Ordinances No. 95-7 and No. 95-8, and the Bill of Impeachment are not valid. We affirm the judgment purusant to Rule 84.16(b). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and retstating the principles of law would have no precedential value. Separate Opinion:

None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions