Anthony Sanford, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Resondent/Respondent.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Anthony Sanford, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Resondent/Respondent. Case Number: 71681 Handdown Date: 02/17/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of City of St. Louis, Hon. Thomas J. Frawley Counsel for Appellant: David C. Hemingway Counsel for Respondent: Seth A. Albin Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Crane, P.J., Russell and J. Dowd, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Anthony Sanford, movant, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find the motion court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.