OTT LAW

Chemco Industries, Inc., Appellant, v. Coatings Corporation International, et al., Respondents.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Chemco Industries, Inc., Appellant, v. Coatings Corporation International, et al., Respondents. Case Number: No. 71536 Handdown Date: 09/09/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Maura McShane Counsel for Appellant: Daniel F. Prebish Counsel for Respondent: William R. Stahlhuth, Amy Hardin Surber, Warren W. Davis and Paul N. Rechenberg Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Rhodes Russell, P.J., Simon, and Karohl, JJ., concur. Opinion:

ORDER Chemco Industries Inc. (Chemco), appeals the granting of summary judgment in favor of Coatings Corporation International (CCI), and its individual officers, directors and shareholders, in an action brought by Chemco for breach of contract (Count I), to recover on an account stated (Count II) and for fraud and a conspiracy to defraud (Count III), involving the sale of 200 metric tons of chlorinated rubber (CR) to CCI. Additionally, Chiswell Langhorne, Jr. (Langhorne), one of the individual defendants in the primary suit between Chemco and CCI, appeals from the trial court's denial of his motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16 (b). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. A memorandum, solely for the uses of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our holdings. Separate Opinion:

None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions