City of Byrnes Mill, Ronald Schmidt and Mary Scheble, Appellants, v. Byrnes Mill 206 Corporation, et al., Respondents.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: City of Byrnes Mill, Ronald Schmidt and Mary Scheble, Appellants, v. Byrnes Mill 206 Corporation, et al., Respondents. Case Number: 72357 and 72435 Handdown Date: 02/10/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. John L. Anderson Counsel for Appellant: Herbert K. Hoffman Counsel for Respondent: Charles F. Dufour, Bradley J. Bakula and C. Finn Sheehan Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell and J. Dowd, J.J., concur. Opinion: Opinion modified by Court's own motion on March 31, 1998. This substitution does not constitute a new opinion. ORDER This is an appeal from a judgment against defendants for malicious prosecution and violations of 42 U.S.C. Sec.

1. There is sufficient evidence to support the judgment. No error of law appears.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We further grant Byrnes Mill 206 Corporation's motion for attorneys' fees incurred on appeal in the amount of $5,466.00. Separate Opinion:

None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.