OTT LAW

Clay B. Wright, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Vincent Wright, Defendant/Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Clay B. Wright, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Vincent Wright, Defendant/Appellant. Case Number: 71810 Handdown Date: 07/21/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Thomas J. Frawley Counsel for Appellant: Bruce Nangle and Barbara Nangle Counsel for Respondent: Rodolfo Rivera Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Grimm, P.J., Pudlowski and Gaertner, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Appellant appeals a judgment of dissolution claiming the court erred: 1) in awarding the respondent a lump sum to be distributed over twenty years and 2) in awarding the respondent an interest in appellant's pension entitlements. We have read the briefs, reviewed the legal file and transcript. We find no error of law and no jurisprudential purpose will be served by an extended written opinion. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions