Craig P. Weger, Respondent, v. Director of Revenue, Appellant.
Decision date: Unknown
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Craig P. Weger, Respondent, v. Director of Revenue, Appellant. Case Number: 73397 Handdown Date: 08/18/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Colleen Dolan Counsel for Appellant: Nadia Termanini Counsel for Respondent: Timothy F. Devereux Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. R. Dowd, Jr., C.J., Pudlowski and Karohl, J.J., concur. Opinion: O R D E R Director of Revenue (Director) appeals judgment setting aside a driver's license suspension under section 302.505 RSMo Cum. Supp. 1996. Director's sole point is the trial court erred in excluding from evidence Exhibit D which contained evidence necessary to uphold the suspension. The court overruled Weger's objection to Exhibit D and received it into evidence. Accordingly, the factual premise for the point on appeal is false. It will not support a finding of trial court error. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Related Opinions
In re: Brian Todd Goldstein, Respondent.(2026)
Supreme Court of MissouriJanuary 23, 2026#SC101182
The Missouri Supreme Court found that attorney Brian Todd Goldstein violated professional conduct rules by mishandling client funds and engaging in dishonest conduct, including taking clients without informing his law firm, misrepresenting trust account practices, and misappropriating over $585,000 from more than 100 clients. The Court ordered Goldstein disbarred based on violations of rules governing safekeeping of property and dishonest conduct.
In re: Mark W. Arensberg, Respondent.(2026)
Supreme Court of MissouriJanuary 13, 2026#SC101157
Attorney Arensberg was disciplined for knowingly drafting fraudulent loan documents to diminish a client's son's marital estate during divorce proceedings. Rather than the agreed-upon reprimand, the court imposed an indefinite suspension with a six-month waiting period for reinstatement, stayed pending successful completion of one-year probation.
Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services vs. Reproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictSeptember 16, 2025#WD87223
Motors Insurance Corporation vs. Autobot Towing, LLC(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictJuly 8, 2025#WD87590
JAMES SANCHEZ, in his capacity as President of INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION 702, KEITH ATCHISON, in his capacity as Vice-President of INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION 702, and QUINTON TILLMAN, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. CITY OF POPLAR BLUFF, MISSOURI, Defendant-Respondent(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictMay 28, 2025#SD38656