Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Craig P. Weger, Respondent, v. Director of Revenue, Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Parties & Roles

Respondent
Craig P. Weger

Disposition

Affirmed

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Craig P. Weger, Respondent, v. Director of Revenue, Appellant. Case Number: 73397 Handdown Date: 08/18/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Colleen Dolan Counsel for Appellant: Nadia Termanini Counsel for Respondent: Timothy F. Devereux Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. R. Dowd, Jr., C.J., Pudlowski and Karohl, J.J., concur. Opinion: O R D E R Director of Revenue (Director) appeals judgment setting aside a driver's license suspension under section 302.505 RSMo Cum. Supp. 1996. Director's sole point is the trial court erred in excluding from evidence Exhibit D which contained evidence necessary to uphold the suspension. The court overruled Weger's objection to Exhibit D and received it into evidence. Accordingly, the factual premise for the point on appeal is false. It will not support a finding of trial court error. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Statutes

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

In re: Brian Todd Goldstein, Respondent.(2026)

Supreme Court of MissouriJanuary 23, 2026#SC101182

dismissed

The Missouri Supreme Court found that attorney Brian Todd Goldstein violated professional conduct rules by mishandling client funds and engaging in dishonest conduct, including taking clients without informing his law firm, misrepresenting trust account practices, and misappropriating over $585,000 from more than 100 clients. The Court ordered Goldstein disbarred based on violations of rules governing safekeeping of property and dishonest conduct.

Read The Corporate Law GuideGuide
Civil Litigationper_curiam2,484 words
Read opinion

In re: Mark W. Arensberg, Respondent.(2026)

Supreme Court of MissouriJanuary 13, 2026#SC101157

modified

Attorney Arensberg was disciplined for knowingly drafting fraudulent loan documents to diminish a client's son's marital estate during divorce proceedings. Rather than the agreed-upon reprimand, the court imposed an indefinite suspension with a six-month waiting period for reinstatement, stayed pending successful completion of one-year probation.

Read The Family Law GuideGuide
Civil Litigationper_curiam3,367 words
Read opinion
Read The Corporate Law GuideGuideRead opinion