Daniel W. Foster, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Daniel W. Foster, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: No. 71631 Handdown Date: 09/16/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. William M. Corrigan Counsel for Appellant: Bradley S. Dede, Charles M. Shaw, Daniel Mohs Counsel for Respondent: John Munson Morris, III Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Grimm, P.J., Pudlowski and Gaertner, JJ., concur. Opinion: O R D E R Appellant, Daniel W. Foster, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision is attached solely for the use of the parties involved. Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.