OTT LAW

Eleanor Bush, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. William H. Friedman, and William H. Friedman & Associates, Inc., Defendants/Respondents.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Eleanor Bush, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. William H. Friedman, and William H. Friedman & Associates, Inc., Defendants/Respondents. Case Number: 71962 Handdown Date: 07/21/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Edward M. Peek Counsel for Appellant: James A. Stemmler Counsel for Respondent: J. Thaddeus Eckenrode Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Opinion: ORDER Appellant appeals a jury verdict claiming the trial court erred: a) in denying appellant's request for discovery; b) in abusing its discretion in denying testimony of a witness and c) in sustaining the respondent's objections in cross- examination of respondent's expert witness. We have read the briefs, reviewed the legal file and transcripts. We find no error of law and no jurisprudential purpose will be served by an extended written opinion. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions