Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Ernest C. Brazzle, Appellant, v. City of Florissant, Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Parties & Roles

Disposition

Undetermined

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar employment law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Ernest C. Brazzle, Appellant, v. City of Florissant, Respondent. Case Number: No. 71339 Handdown Date: 06/27/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. James R. Hartenbach Counsel for Appellant: Counsel for Respondent: Opinion Summary: Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: Before Russell, P.J.; Simon and Karohl, JJ. Opinion:

O R D E R Appellant, Ernest C. Brazzle, appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County in favor of respondent, the City of Florissant, on his claims of age discrimination, handicap discrimination, and retaliation, allegedly resulting in his discharge from the Florissant Police Department. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

Kathryn Torre-Stewart, Appellant/Plaintiff, v. The Washington University-St. Louis, Respondent/Defendant.(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictFebruary 24, 2026#ED113602

affirmed

The court affirmed the dismissal of plaintiff's disability discrimination and hostile work environment claims under the Missouri Human Rights Act because she failed to plead facts demonstrating legal disability or a hostile work environment based on disability. However, the court reversed and remanded the retaliation claim, finding that plaintiff alleged sufficient facts establishing the elements of retaliation under the Act based on her complaints of disability discrimination.

Read The Employment Law GuideGuide
Civil Litigationper_curiam7,351 words
Read opinion