OTT LAW

Ernest C. Brazzle, Appellant, v. City of Florissant, Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Ernest C. Brazzle, Appellant, v. City of Florissant, Respondent. Case Number: No. 71339 Handdown Date: 06/27/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. James R. Hartenbach Counsel for Appellant: Counsel for Respondent: Opinion Summary: Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: Before Russell, P.J.; Simon and Karohl, JJ. Opinion:

O R D E R Appellant, Ernest C. Brazzle, appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County in favor of respondent, the City of Florissant, on his claims of age discrimination, handicap discrimination, and retaliation, allegedly resulting in his discharge from the Florissant Police Department. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions