Hartford Casualty Insurance Company, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Matthew Carr, et al., Defendants/Appellants

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Hartford Casualty Insurance Company, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Matthew Carr, et al., Defendants/Appellants Case Number: 72409 Handdown Date: 01/20/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court St. Louis County Counsel for Appellant: Kathy M. Wilke, Dean R. Gallego Counsel for Respondent: Karen M. Speiser Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Simon and Hoff, J.J. Opinion: ORDER Matthew Carr, David Carr, individually and as guardian ad litem for Matthew Carr, Marcia Carr, Jason Hart, and Patricia Hart appeal the granting of summary judgment in favor of Hartford Casualty Insurance Company (Hartford) in an action brought by Hartford for declaratory judgment. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find that no error of law appears. As an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16 (b). A memorandum solely for the use of the parties involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision. Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.