Jimmy Parsons, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Jimmy Parsons, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: No. 71240 Handdown Date: 07/15/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. William Corrigan Counsel for Appellant: S. Paige Canfield Counsel for Respondent: John Munson Morris, III, Attorney General Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Dowd, P.J., Reinhard and Gaertner, JJ., concur. Opinion: O R D E R Appellant, Jimmy Parsons, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely filed. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. The time limits of Rule 24.035 have been found valid, mandatory, and reasonable. Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 695 (Mo.banc 1989). As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.