John J. Nooney, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Nooney Company, Defendant-Appellant.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: John J. Nooney, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Nooney Company, Defendant-Appellant. Case Number: No. 70783 Handdown Date: 07/29/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. John K. Kintz Counsel for Appellant: Michael A. Kahn and David A. Streubel Counsel for Respondent: Peter W. Herzog and Michael A. Vitale Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Rhodes Russell, P.J., Simon and Karohl, JJ., concur. Opinion:

ORDER The Nooney Company appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of its former officer, John Nooney, indemnifying him pursuant to an agreement for expenses he incurred on behalf of the company. We affirm. An extended opinion would serve no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.